• English
  • Русский

Gates Foundation says no payments were made towards Epstein, following internal investigation

An external review conducted by the Gates Foundation has found no evidence of payments made or participation in criminal activities linked to late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the philanthropic group said on Tuesday.

The foundation's investigation was conducted by the law firm WilmerHale and commissioned by CEO Mark Suzman, with the support of the foundation’s Chair, Bill Gates, and the independent members of the Board, the foundation said in a statement.

Some 50 interviews were conducted in total, with both former and current employees, while extensive written materials were also reviewed during the investigation.

According to the investigation, the foundation only had contacted Epstein in two instances between 2011 and 2014. The first time was through a “proposed donor-advised fund (DAF) that would pool contributions from high-net-worth individuals to support global public health.”

The foundation finally rejected the proposal, according to the statement.

The second instance involved the International Peace Institute (IPI), a nonprofit Epstein introduced to the Chair. 

"The foundation subsequently provided grant funding to IPI, following internal diligence and review, for polio eradication support," the statement read.

This is a developing story.

US appeals court overturns release of pro-Palestinian advocate Mahdawi, citing lack of jurisdiction

A US appeals court on Tuesday overturned a 2025 ruling that ordered the Trump administration to release pro-Palestinian advocate Mohsen Mahdawi from immigration detention, finding that the lower court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case.

Mahdawi, 35, was one of several non-citizen students who were placed in deportation proceedings last year after taking part in demonstrations against Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The arrests prompted court challenges that placed US President Donald Trump’s crackdown on immigration against the right to free speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

Tuesday's decision from a three-judge panel of the Manhattan-based 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals stopped short of backing the Trump administration's push to deport non-citizens in the US lawfully on the basis that their presence in the country runs counter to US foreign policy – a practice that rights groups say infringes on free speech.

But taken together with another decision earlier this year in the case of pro-Palestinian advocate Mahmoud Khalil, the ruling could make it more difficult for non-citizens detained in immigration jails to quickly seek their release on the grounds of an alleged violation of their First Amendment rights.

Mahdawi, a West Bank-born Columbia University student, was arrested in April 2025 upon arriving for an interview for his US citizenship petition. Vermont-based US District Judge Geoffrey Crawford ordered him released on bond two weeks later, ruling that he enjoyed the same First Amendment free speech rights as US citizens.

In overturning that ruling, the 2nd Circuit panel said Crawford lacked jurisdiction over the case because it should have been resolved in immigration court first. The judges did not order Mahdawi's re-arrest.

US immigration courts, which conduct deportation proceedings, are overseen by the Justice Department. District courts like Crawford's, by contrast, weigh constitutional issues and are independent of the executive branch.

The panel included two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and a third appointed by former President George W. Bush.

Neither the Justice Department, which represents the federal government in court, nor the Department of Homeland Security, which handles immigration enforcement, immediately responded to requests for comment.

A spokesperson for the American Civil Liberties Union, which is representing Mahdawi, had no immediate comment.

Earlier this year, the Philadelphia-based 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals reached a similar conclusion in the case of Khalil, a Columbia University graduate who spent more than 100 days in immigration detention before his release on bond by a federal judge in New Jersey.

Khalil has asked the US Supreme Court to review the divided 3rd Circuit’s conclusion that his claims should have been heard through an appeal of a removal order from an immigration court.

Both Khalil and Mahdawi were authorized to be in the United States, and neither has been charged with a crime.

About freedom and rules

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought and action within the framework of ethical and moral principles, and the mission of Our team is to provide this right to all who need it.

Everyone can express their free opinion, tell Us about injustice, about all cases when no one can help. We will help. We will not allow the free-thinking person to be driven into the framework and vice of the system. Be it a state apparatus or private structures, no one has the right to act outside the laws of conscience.

All people have the right to a free and happy life without borders. If You have something to share with other people, You want to tell something that You can not tell in person or something has happened with You — know that We are not indifferent to all the problems connected with violation of moral rights. You can always write to Us and share Your story, We will never disclose Your identity to anyone, sometimes We don`t know it ourselves, but We will help.

We are not a commercial, religious or political organization. Our goal is to unite free people for the sake of peace and mutual assistance.

We are Anonymous, We are Free, We are for Justice.

“Corruption — Engine of Any Kind of Crime”

Get help now

Send a message with a description of your problem and possible ways of assistance and we will contact you as soon as we consider your problem.